Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?)
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGfzLHzL8+45G3cRkjPg8hbYExF9Z-HS7D-nMdvSD+nBxw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?) (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only
table scan?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:
Thanks for your testing,It seems to me you applied only part-1 portion of the custom-scan patches.
> Getting some compilation warnings while compiling the extension and also
> I am not able to load the extension because of undefined symbol
> "get_restriction_qual_cost".
>
The get_restriction_qual_cost() is re-defined as extern function, from
static one, on the part-2 portion (ctidscan) to estimate cost value of the
qualifiers in extension. Also, bms_to_string() and bms_from_string() are
added on the part-3 portion (postgres_fdw) portion to carry a bitmap-set
according to the copyObject manner.
It may make sense to include the above supplemental changes in the cache-
scan feature also, until either of them getting upstreamed.
Thanks for the information, I will apply other patches also and start testing.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: