Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGfnv1hjOxcf4UB7-7eBdM=ppfxzxmVzhjfBCZ+4LozwfA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for the patch. This shows a very good performance improvement.Thank you. Can you please share the benchmark you ran, results and observations?I just ran a performance test on my laptop with minimal configuration, it didn't show muchimprovement, currently I don't have access to a big machine to test the performance.I started reviewing the patch, during this process and I ran the regressiontest on the WARM patch. I observed a failure in create_index test.This may be a bug in code or expected that needs to be corrected.Can you please share the diff? I ran regression after applying patch on the current master and did not find any change? Does it happen consistently?Yes, it is happening consistently. I ran the make installcheck. Attached the regression.diffs file with the failed test.I applied the previous warm patch on this commit - e3e66d8a9813d22c2aa027d8f373a96d4d4c1b15
Currently the patch is moved to next CF with "needs review" state.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: