Re: Unicode license compatibility with PostgreSQL license
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unicode license compatibility with PostgreSQL license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGfPEE3F=bC15WhVSzH0hqb-ncF=J3UD9eMD62-Oa=TRuA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unicode license compatibility with PostgreSQL license (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote: >> For our next set of development activities in PostgreSQL, we want to >> use the Unicode organization code with PostgreSQL to open source that >> feature. Is the Unicode license is compatible with PostgreSQL. > > Do you mean that you'd like to add ICU support? I think that would be > extremely interesting, FWIW. The stability of ICU collations would be > quite helpful from a number of different perspective. One of which is > that having a contract about the stability of strxfrm()-style binary > keys would allow me to make text abbreviated keys exploited in the > internal pages of B-Tree indexes, to greatly reduce cache misses with > index scans on text attributes. This general technique already been > very effective with sorting [1], but it feels likely that we'll need > ICU to make the abbreviation technique useful for indexes. > > [1] http://pgeoghegan.blogspot.com/2015/01/abbreviated-keys-exploiting-locality-to.html Hi All, Thanks for the information. we are just evaluating some conversion algorithms to convert from UTF32/16 to UTF8 and vice versa. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: