Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
| От | Haribabu Kommi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJrrPGfBYWWK+qoMbm8swqwY8HWehSYbbTYcBH+QybdviQzKFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could this question be answered? The patch still applies so I am
>> moving it to next CF.
Rebased, 'cause it broke.
Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to
test the serialize parallel query.
Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite
or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch
into "ready for committer" state.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: