Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGfAps3J6S_Crx-XwF9zpDzV7j1JAWs0eUwmfagvxSaDZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:01 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2018-12-10 18:13:40 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-11-26 17:55:57 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > FWIW, now that oids are removed, and the tuple table slot abstraction
> > got in, I'm working on rebasing the pluggable storage patchset ontop of
> > that.
>
> I've pushed a version to that to the git tree, including a rebased
> version of zheap:
> https://github.com/anarazel/postgres-pluggable-storage
> https://github.com/anarazel/postgres-pluggable-zheap
I've pushed the newest, substantially revised, version to the same
repository. Note, that while the newest pluggable-zheap version is newer
than my last email, it's not based on the latest version, and the
pluggable-zheap development is now happening in the main zheap
repository.
Thanks for the new version of patches and changes.
Todo:
- consider removing scan_update_snapshot
Attached the patch for removal of scan_update_snapshot
and also the rebased patch of reduction in use of t_tableOid.
- consider removing table_gimmegimmeslot()
- add substantial docs for every callback
Will work on the above two.
While I saw an initial attempt at writing smgl docs for the table AM
API, I'm not convinced that's the best approach. I think it might make
more sense to have high-level docs in sgml, but then do all the
per-callback docs in tableam.h.
OK, I will update the sgml docs accordingly.
Index AM has per callback docs in the sgml, refactor them also?
Regards,
Haribabu Kommi
Fujitsu Australia
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: