Re: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGeyTAHT1ysWSayQpUvGjJ+rWeFVErOZ6VS1ps_Rh+6sQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall (Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 06:39 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com wrote: Still i feel the GRANT statements should be present, as the create
database statement
is generated only with -C option. So attached patch produces the GRANT
statements based
on the -x option.
The attached patch does the job fine. However, I am a little skeptical about this addition, since, it is clearly mentioned in the documentation of pg_dump that it would not restore global objects, then why expecting this. This addditon makes pg_dump -C somewhat special as now it is restoring these grant statements. Only if we consider the popular method of dump-restore mentioned in the thread (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1VYMqi-0001P4-P4%40w rigleys.postgresql.org) with pg_dumpall -g and then individual pg_dump, then it would be helpful to have this patch.
Thanks for your comments.
I am also not sure whether pg_dumpall -g and then individual pg_dump
is the more widely used approach or not? If it is the case, it is better
to fix the grant statements with -C option, otherwise I agree that
this patch is not required.
Any opinions from other members?
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: