Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
От | Haribabu Kommi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJrrPGek_7Qj=N7A2MYrZ5Z19kWLJhsv+c-tyPd2vaOGd734fg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Haribabu KommiHmm, this API is exposed via heapam.h. Am I missing something?<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +typedef struct StorageAmRoutine
>> +{
>>
>> In this structure, you have already covered most of the API's that a
>> new storage module needs to provide, but I think there could be more.
>> One such API could be heap_hot_search. This seems specific to current
>> heap where we have the provision of HOT. I think we can provide a new
>> API tuple_search or something like that.
>
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Yes, the storageAmRoutine needs more function pointers. Currently I am
> adding all the functions that are present in the heapam.h and some slot
> related function from tuptable.h.
>
Sorry I was not clearly explaining in my earlier mail. Yes your are right
that the heap_hot_search function exists in heapam.h, but I am yet to
add all the exposed functions that are present in the heapam.h file to
the storageAmRoutine structure.
> Once I stabilize the code and API's that
> are
> currently added, then I will further enhance it with remaining functions
> that
> are necessary to support pluggable storage API.
>
Sure, but I think if we found any thing during development/review,
then we should either add it immediately or at the very least add fix
me in a patch to avoid forgetting the finding.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: