Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
| От | Haribabu Kommi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJrrPGcO8XPNHNuOmrpFTtj8=5tWwgSBbmEfR53dFx_g3efYYg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
No, that is not true. You have quoted the wrong message, that
discussion was about WALWriteLock contention not about the patch being
discussed in this thread. I have posted the latest set of patches
here [1]. Tomas is supposed to share the results of his tests. He
mentioned to me in PGConf Asia last week that he ran few tests on
Power Box, so let us wait for him to share his findings.
> Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" status. Please feel free to
> update the status if the current status differs with the actual patch
> status.
>
I think we should keep the status as "Needs Review".
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JjatUZu0% 2BHCi%3D5VM1q-hFgN_ OhegPAwEUJqxf-7pESbg%40mail. gmail.com
Thanks for the update.
I changed the status to "needs review" in 2017-01 commitfest.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: