Re: Clear logical slot's 'synced' flag on promotion of standby
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clear logical slot's 'synced' flag on promotion of standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uDrzhpy2n+awM3RrhwmeeJkyK5F7JHb7g=0pUv9nSd95A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clear logical slot's 'synced' flag on promotion of standby (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:18 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 9:42 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 6:41 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > 3) > > > > + ereport(LOG, > > > > + (errmsg("reset synced flag for replication slot \"%s\"", > > > > + NameStr(s->data.name)))); > > > > > > > > a) Shall we change it to DEBUG1? > > > > b) Shall the msg be: > > > > synced flag reset for replication slot \"%s\" during promotion > > > > > > > > > > I think this can stay as a LOG message, it only runs once at startup > > > and applies just to logical slots, so it won’t be noisy. > > > > It does not run at startup, it runs during promotion. Having said > > that, if there are a lot many slots, and we have one message per slot, > > overall logs can still be more. I somehow find DEBUG better here. But > > we can leave it as LOG and can revisit later when others review. > > > > > I’d also > > > avoid mentioning “during promotion,” since the flag might accidentally > > > be set on the primary and then reset later during startup, making that > > > description inaccurate. > > > > This function is called only during promotion (see check 'if > > (promoted)') and thus the suggested message ( “during promotion") > > seems better to me. > > > > ResetSyncedSlots might be called during promotion, but > RestoreSlotFromDisk (which runs during standard PostgreSQL startup) > performs the same functionality. This creates a scenario where the > sync flag could be reset during either promotion or regular startup. I > think we should either remove it, or ensure it is present in both > places for consistency. > Sorry I missed this email somehow. Yes, I agree. We can have DEBUG1 at both places. But let's see what others think on this. thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: