Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 4:29 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > drop_obsolete_slots                  drop_local_synced_slots
>
> The new name doesn't convey the intent of the function. If we want to
> have a difference based on remote/local slots then we can probably
> name it as drop_local_obsolete_slots.
>
> > reserve_wal_for_slot                 reserve_wal_for_local_slot
> > local_slot_update                      update_local_synced_slot
> > update_and_persist_slot           update_and_persist_local_synced_slot
> >
>
> The new names sound better in the above cases as the current names
> appear too generic.

Sure, made the suggested function name changes. Since there is no
other change, I kept the version as v80_2.

thanks
Shveta