Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uDKPK537ZW8CAjDVmSjHtBKCzTUzq=it84SrA0PfoWFCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:15 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 11/27/23 7:02 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote: > > On Monday, November 27, 2023 12:03 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> > >> Attach the V38 patch set which addressed all comments in [1][2] except for the > >> ones that mentioned above. > >> > >> [1] > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv-yu71ogj_hRi6cCtmD5 > >> 5bsyw7XTxj1Nq8yVFKpY3NDQ%40mail.gmail.com > >> [2] > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuEGX5kr0xh06yv8ndoA > >> QvDNedoec1OqOq3GMxDN6p%3D9A%40mail.gmail.com > > > > I didn't increment the patch version, sorry for that. Attach the same patch set > > but increment the patch version to V39. > > Thanks! > > It looks like v39 does not contain (some / all?) the changes that have been > done in v38 [1]. > > For example, slot_exists_in_list() still exists in v39 while it was renamed to > validate_sync_slot() in v38. > Yes, I noticed that and informed Hou-san about this. New patches will be posted soon with the correction. Meanwhile, please review v38 instead if you intend to review patch002 right now. v39 is supposed to have changes in patch001 alone. thanks Shveta thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: