Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uCVJGHce_gVsFMJkVAUbW-KNZq+9F9oA4VYJs5w3uoVRw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:19 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:33 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense to me to move the check. > > > 2. If the wal_level is not logical, the server will need to restart > anyway to change the wal_level and have the slotsync worker work. Does > it make sense to have the postmaster exit if the wal_level is not > logical and sync_replication_slots is enabled? For instance, we have > similar checks in PostmsaterMain(): > > if (summarize_wal && wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_MINIMAL) > ereport(ERROR, > (errmsg("WAL cannot be summarized when wal_level is > \"minimal\""))); Thanks for the feedback. I have addressed it in v93. thanks SHveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: