Re: Replication slot is not able to sync up
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slot is not able to sync up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uBk6RtejESK1aHtEs2spq0DkOc_OvkTvhakhjRn0dqwqw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slot is not able to sync up (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication slot is not able to sync up
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:13 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Phrases like "... it is recommended..." and "... intended for testing > and debugging .. " and "... should be used with caution." and "... it > is advisable to..." seem like indicators that parts of the above > description should be using SGML markup such as <caution> or <warning> > or <note> instead of just plain text. > I feel WARNING and CAUTION markups could be a little strong for the concerned case. Such markups are generally used when there is a side-effect involved with the usage. But in our case, there is no such side-effect with the API. At max it may fail without harming the system and will succeed in the next invocation. But I also feel that such sections catch user attention. Thus if needed, we can have a NOTE section to convey the recommended way of slot synchronization. Thoughts? Similar to our case, I see some other docs using caution words without a CAUTION markup. Please search for 'caution' in [1],[2],[3] [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-altertable.html [3]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/oauth-validator-design.html#OAUTH-VALIDATOR-DESIGN-USERMAP-DELEGATION thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: