Re: Wraparound
| От | Rajesh Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Wraparound |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJk5AtbKkv0AFfGkm-qS2ekG0bjCeEYe-pyHxorQcwAF-WKSvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Wraparound (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Wraparound
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Sorry, I could not understand. If possible, please elaborate. Otherwise, no issues
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, 12:53 Laurenz Albe, <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 10:02 +0530, Rajesh Kumar wrote:
> Is autovacuum wraparound issue is when transaction id reaches
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age or if transaction Reaches 2^32.
>
> My autovacuum_freeze_age setting is 200million.
>
> Db size is 150gb.
2^31 is the magical number at which very old transactions become
transactions from the future, which would cause data loss unless
all old rows have been frozen.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: