Re: Should I add a Index Key in this case ?
От | Steve Midgley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should I add a Index Key in this case ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJexoSJ-08_uaDwm+5GNieYqEJ-QayMwQGzR1u1-2CEcQ+fsHw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should I add a Index Key in this case ? (Karen Goh <karenworld@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should I add a Index Key in this case ?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:36 AM Karen Goh <karenworld@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have a use case as follows :
add constraints to the database so that no two reservations for the same viewing may refer to the same seat.
So, say I have a primary key like this in the table A:
SEAT_id integer NOT NULL GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY ( INCREMENT 1 START 1 MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 2147483647 CACHE 1 ),
CONSTRAINT A_pkey PRIMARY KEY (SEAT_id))
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
TABLESPACE pg_default;
So, basically I would like to create a SEAT_Viewing_Id.
In this case, do I create a Index Key or ?
How should I construct or rather alter my table A to accomodate this SEAT_Viewing_Id ?
Hope someone can tell me how.
Furthermore, whenever an insertion is done via WebApp, I would have to insert the Index key as well or does PostgreSQL will have a way to increment the Index key which is the SEAT_Viewing_Id at the same time?
Thanks & regards,
Karen
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you want to do, but it sounds like you are want to create a second field/column in your table named "SEAT_viewing_id" and you want that field to auto-increment independently from the primary key? If so, you can consider the "serial" datatype as possiblye meeting your needs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-SERIAL
So just `alter table`, to add your new field, and make its datatype `serial`.
Apologies if I misunderstood your question,
Steve
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: