Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A minor comment on the 0001 patch: In the message I think that using
> > "ID" would look better than lowercase "id" and AFAICS it's more
> > consistent with existing messages.
> >
> > + appendStringInfo(&buf, _(" in transaction id %u with commit timestamp %s"),
> >
>
> You have a point but I think in this case it might look a bit odd as
> we have another field 'commit timestamp' after that which is
> lowercase.
>

I did a quick search and I couldn't find any other messages in the
Postgres code that use "transaction id", but I could find some that
use "transaction ID" and "transaction identifier".


Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia