Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
От | Greg Nancarrow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJcOf-ckGONzyAj0Y70ju_tfLWF819JYb=dv9p5AnoZxm50j0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 6:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please find attached the latest patch set v97* > I couldn't spot spot any significant issues in the v97-0001 patch, but do have the following trivial feedback comments: (1) doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml Suggestion: BEFORE: + contains a Stream Prepare or Stream Commit or Stream Abort message. AFTER: + contains a Stream Prepare, Stream Commit or Stream Abort message. (2) src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c It seems a bit weird to add a forward declaration here, without a comment, like for the one immediately above it /* Compute GID for two_phase transactions */ static void TwoPhaseTransactionGid(Oid subid, TransactionId xid, char *gid, int szgid); - +static int apply_spooled_messages(TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn); (3) src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c Other DEBUG1 messages don't end with "." + elog(DEBUG1, "apply_handle_stream_prepare: replayed %d (all) changes.", nchanges); Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: