Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
| От | John Naylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJVSVGXM2hGeZsz196Mod8JV+KReRzZcewA+PW3Ab4J-THt8wg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/22/18, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> how about letting the line go long, with the comment at the right of
> each definition, with one blank line between struct members, as in the
> sample below? You normally don't care that these lines are too long
> since you seldom edit them -- one mostly adds or remove entire lines
> instead, so there's not as much need for side-by-side diffs as with
> regular code. (One issue with this proposal is how to convince pgindent
> to leave the long lines alone.)
Yeah, it seems when perltidy or pgindent mangle things badly, it's to
try and shoehorn a long line into a smaller number of characters. If
memory serves, I've come across things like this:
pg_node_tree proargdefaults BKI_DEFAULT(_null_); /* list of expression
trees for argument
defaults (NULL if none) */
And thought "only a machine could be so precisely awkward"
-John Naylor
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: