Re: timestamp with time zone ~> GMT

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Hmm, I kind of like the up-front statement that timestamptz stores
> >> UTC.  How about this simpler change?
>
> > I thought the re-order made sense since the preceding paragraph talks
> > exclusively about behavior, so this paragraph first contrasts the
> > behavioral difference between the two, and then mentions the storage
> > aspects as part of that story.
> > I actually like the above as well, but if it were me I'd move all
> > mentions of storage (the existing + the above) to the end of the
> > paragraph after the behavior aspects.
>
> OK, it makes more sense when considering the previous para as well.
> Here's a combined proposal that also adds glossary entries.
>

+1

Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net