Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer
| От | Patrick B |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJNY3ivSvkQ2DW9DvvXoc1bj6WuhhYAHLBg2GnO3TSdKFBTJiQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | effective_cache_size X shared_buffer (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
2017-04-03 13:23 GMT+12:00 Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>:
Hi guys.I'm thinking about increasing the query cache for my PG 9.2 server.I've got a project happening, which is doing lots and lots of writes and reads during the night, and in the morning I see PG cache warming up again, as all the cache "was used" by those write and read tasks.So my environment gets very slow for a few hours, until the queries used on a daily basis go to the cache.Question:Should I increase effective_cache_sizeor shared_buffer? What's the difference between them? ThanksPatrick
Can I also increase shared_buffer on my slave only? Would that make any difference if using selects on the slave? Or this parameter must be the same across all servers (Master/slaves) ?
Thanks
P.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: