Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
| От | Jaime Casanova |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJKUy5ijJE_xbZq91YzZSgN73uULQ9ppjPvog4-7ca+6ck0Rjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058 >> >> Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional. >> Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch >> will complain about that either; or at least I don't see why the >> behavior should be any different. > > Can someone enlighten me on this point? > mmm! you're right... it's not complaining either... i was sure it was... and i'm not sure i want to contor things for that... so, just forget my last mail about that... your refactor is just fine for me -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: