Re: gistVacuumUpdate
| От | Jaime Casanova |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: gistVacuumUpdate |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJKUy5iiEA-3Sq6WrObJzQrj9eTRtQB0m6_jpLRGuF3=zHHb5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: gistVacuumUpdate (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 13.01.2012 06:24, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> gistVacuumUpdate was removed when old-style VACUUM FULL was removed. >> i wonder why. >> it was not practical and REINDEX is preferred? >> >> anyway, the removal seems incomplete and there are some leftovers: >> F_TUPLES_DELETED >> F_DELETED >> XLOG_GIST_PAGE_DELETE > > > Hmm, in theory we might bring back support for deleting pages in the future, > I'm guessing F_DELETED and the WAL record type were left in place because of > that. I guess it was an oversight, because GistPageSetDeleted() is being used in gistRedoPageDeleteRecord() and GistPageIsDeleted() in a few other places -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: