Re: pg_stats_recovery view
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stats_recovery view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJKUy5i05BKO=yPtCNFKiNwEe6WnYihkpBFH1+dAvXuYbhXagw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stats_recovery view (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Re: pg_stats_recovery view |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment: > do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It > will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store > it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand? > fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the info locally and send it on demand. about the _short_desc functions, i added that because i wanted to understand what was happening during recovery and the wal_record_type (xl_info) being a number is not that clear -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: