Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJKUy5hjEz21+s-3qVteKWzLn-qLK2D-8pbjSp+z7Fe7BpNGaw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> The smaller step of automatically stripping the specified suffix from the >>> input file name, when it matches the one we've told the program to expect, >>> seems like a usability improvement unlikely to lead to bad things though. >>> I've certainly made the mistake you've shown when using the patched version >>> of the program myself, just didn't think about catching and correcting it >>> myself before. We can rev this to add that feature and resubmit easily >>> enough, will turn that around soon. >> >> This change seems plenty small enough to slip in even at this late >> date, but I guess we're lacking a new version of the patch. >> > > Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex. > Which reminds me, I never thank him for the review (shame on me) :D > with the patch this time -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: