Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJKUy5h74BddLLG6q6FZ3ZpmEdCE9g6cEoPfxtt-vWA7QGN+xA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote: >> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote: >>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure >>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be >>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is >>> openjade, or really the original project. >> >> It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro >> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to >> use openjade. >> > > so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or > should we fail after not finding jade and report why? > the last one should read "openjade" ;) -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: