Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJGNTePbfHqWaCU50Jrg7hqFpDpZZ17qiy_bzgcBH26s0-Ac3w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 22:01, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 06:29:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Perhaps you are right though, and that we don't need to spend this > > much energy into improving the error messages so I am fine to discard > > this part. At the end, in order to remove the crashes, you just need > > to keep around the two RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() checks. But I would > > rather keep these two to use ereport(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED) > > instead of elog(), and keep the test coverage of the previous patch > > (including the tests for the aggregates I noticed were missing). > > Would you be fine with that? > > And this means the attached. Thoughts are welcome. so, currently the patch just installs protections on both currtid_* functions and adds some tests... therefore we can consider it as a bug fix and let it go in 13? actually also backpatch in 12... patch works, server doesn't crash anymore only point to mention is a typo (a missing "l") in an added comment: + * currtid_byrename -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: