Re: to_date_valid()
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: to_date_valid() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJGNTeO75ZPm3qDk9rze7coGyvCZyWm68iEFY3WOYb5w=7OdBg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: to_date_valid() (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: to_date_valid()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">El 2/7/2016 20:33, "Euler Taveira" <<a href="mailto:euler@timbira.com.br">euler@timbira.com.br</a>>escribió:<br /> ><br /> > On 02-07-2016 22:04, Andreas'ads' Scherbaum wrote:<br /> > > The attached patch adds a new function "to_date_valid()" which will<br /> >> validate the date and return an error if the input and output date do<br /> > > not match. Tests included,documentation update as well.<br /> > ><br /> > Why don't you add a third parameter (say, validate = true| false)<br /> > instead of creating another function? The new parameter could default to<br /> > false to notbreak compatibility.<br /> ><p dir="ltr">Shouldn't we fix this instead? Sounds like a bug to me. We don't usually wantto be bug compatible so it doesn't matter if we break something. <p dir="ltr">--<br /> Jaime Casanova <ahref="http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/">http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/</a><br /> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training& Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: