Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJGNTeN4iqAAjUn1UJJR-Yhat-B7zsKkj50KN-AYzkE5fStXvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 21:21, James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 2:49 PM Jaime Casanova > <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > With sqlsmith I found a query that gives this error: > > ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist > > [...] > > > > But if I set enable_incremental_sort to off the query gets executed > > without problems (attached the explain produced for that case) > > Thanks for the report. > Hi, by experiment I reduced the query to this --- 0 --- select distinct subq_0.c1 as c0, case when (true = pg_catalog.pg_rotate_logfile_old()) then ref_0.t else ref_0.t end as c4 from public.ref_0, lateral (select ref_0.i as c1 from generate_series(1, 100) as ref_1) as subq_0 --- 0 --- the only custom table already needed can be created with this commands: --- 0 --- create table ref_0 as select repeat('abcde', (random() * 10)::integer) t, random() * 1000 i from generate_series(1, 500000); create index on ref_0 (i); analyze ref_0 ; --- 0 --- > Is there by an chance an index on ref_0.radi_text_temp? > there is an index involved but not on that field, commands above create the index in the right column... after that, ANALYZE the table > And if you set enable_hashagg = off what plan do you get (or error)? > same error -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: