Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
От | Andrew Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] background sessions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJEAwVGdvabmLCAmFexLrL9NfEfM-QumQjGQ_71b2-7D62S9AQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] background sessions (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-12-14 20:45 GMT+05:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>: > On 12/11/16 5:38 AM, Andrew Borodin wrote: >> 2. From my point of view the interface of the feature is the strong >> point here (compared to pg_background). But it does not help >> programmer to follow good practice: bgworker is a valuable and limited >> resource, may be we could start session with something like >> TryBeginSession()? > > What exactly would that do? Return status (success\failure) and session object, if a function succeeded. If there is max_connections exceeded, then (false,null). I'm not sure whether this idiom is common for Python. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: