Re: Improper type conversion from smallint to short
| От | Igor Urisman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improper type conversion from smallint to short |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJ9OwnU6W+Wc9=mBXSOe3amkDRvoWArdpFCqp_6pW8cPMs6mLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improper type conversion from smallint to short (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Thanks, Kevin & Kris.
I should have looked this up myself. Just seemed hard to fathom that the following code shouldn't work:
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
...
Field f = reflectFieldOfInterest();
f.set(this, resultSet.getObject("some_column"));
The last statement bombs on Integer to short assignment even though, by my reckoning, ResultSet.getObject() exists precisely for this use case.
-Igor.
-Igor.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
Igor Urisman <igor.urisman@gmail.com> wrote:I count on drivers complying with the published specification. The
> It appears that ResultSet.getObject(String name) returns Integer
> for database type Types.SMALLINT (5) I expected Short.
most recent version I was able to find near the top of a quick web
search was this (the Final Release of the JDBC 4.0 Specification):
http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/jdbc-4.0-fr-eval-oth-JSpec/jdbc-4_0-fr-spec.zip
Take a look at the "Data Type Conversion Tables" in appendix B. In
particular, table B-3 specifies which Java object class should be
returned by the getObject methods for each JDBC type. To do as you
request would break the applications of everyone who trusts the
specification published through the Java Community Process.
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: