Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ7c6TPY4+ct-BT9CH6z6tajn179O=p4jn+6rdrKn486=jYNtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers, > I extracted the introduction of XID_FMT macro to a separate patch. Also, > I noticed that sometimes PRIu64 was used to format XIDs instead. I changed it > to XID_FMT for consistency. v12-0003 can be safely delivered in PG15. [...] > > > I encourage trying to break down the patch into smaller incrementally useful > > > pieces. E.g. making all the SLRUs 64bit would be a substantial and > > > independently committable piece. > > > > I'm going to address this in follow-up emails. > > cfbot is not happy because several files are missing in v12. Here is a > corrected and rebased version. I also removed the "#undef PRIu64" > change from include/c.h since previously I replaced PRIu64 usage with > XID_FMT. Here is a new version of the patchset. SLRU refactoring was moved to a separate patch. Both v14-0003 (XID_FMT macro) and v14-0004 (SLRU refactoring) can be delivered in PG15. One thing I couldn't understand so far is why SLRU_PAGES_PER_SEGMENT should necessarily be increased in order to make 64-bit XIDs work. I kept the current value (32) in v14-0004 but changed it to 2048 in ./v14-0005 (where we start using 64 bit XIDs) as it was in the original patch. Is this change really required? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: