Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ7c6TPO91eG4wK2WdnZXXov3itJz2swEVvTurQMRu+Yd7fnqA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andres, > Attached is v10 of the meson patchset. Lots of small changes, I don't think > anything major. I tried to address most of Peter's feedback for the earlier > patches. > > After this I plan to clean up the "export" patch, since that's I think the > next bigger step, and an improvement on its own. The step after will be to > discuss where we want the output of tests to reside, whether the naming scheme > for tests is good etc. > > I did try to address Peter's criticism around inconsistency of the added > parameters to perl scripts. I hope it's more consistent now. I used the > opportunity to make src/tools/msvc use the "output directory" parameters, > providing coverage for those paths (and removing a few unnecessary chdirs, but > ...). Thanks for continuing to work on this! Just a quick question - is there a reason for changing the subject of the emails? Not all email clients handle this well, e.g. Google Mail considers this being 10 separate threads. The CF application and/or pgsql-hackers@ archive also don't recognise this as a continuation of the original thread. So all the discussions in -v8, -v9, -v9 ets threads get lost. May I suggest using a single thread? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: