Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ7c6TO_T4QaKEfquZKbkXeC1Ktu2cSJp7sKCi-LbEGqyg=79w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache (Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Zhang, > The doc says we don’t take lock during pg_buffercache_summary, but I see locks in the v8 patch, Isn’t it? > > ``` > Similar to <function>pg_buffercache_pages</function> function > <function>pg_buffercache_summary</function> doesn't take buffer manager > locks [...] > ``` Correct, the procedure doesn't take the locks of the buffer manager. It does take the locks of every individual buffer. I agree that the text is somewhat confusing, but it is consistent with the current description of pg_buffercache [1]. I think this is a problem worth addressing but it also seems to be out of scope of the proposed patch. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgbuffercache.html -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: