Re: Add uuid_to_base32hex() and base32hex_to_uuid() built-in functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: Add uuid_to_base32hex() and base32hex_to_uuid() built-in functions
Дата
Msg-id CAJ7c6TODbDHpF3Qj1f5nvGKUgv=j1aYvGfZ8ryjrpvCZ5WviSg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add uuid_to_base32hex() and base32hex_to_uuid() built-in functions  (Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>)
Ответы Отв.: Re: Add uuid_to_base32hex() and base32hex_to_uuid() built-in functions
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Sergey,

> It seems that bytea is your personal interest, since you continue to impose your bytea when a better solution has
alreadybeen found with uuid_encode() and uuid_decode().
 

In the previous messages Masahiko Sawada wrote:

> Or providing
> 'uuid_encode(uuid, format text) -> text' and 'uuid_decode(text, format
> text) -> uuid' might make sense too, but I'm not sure. I'd like to
> hear opinions from other hackers too.

I merely shared my personal opinion on why I think this is a bad idea.
Let's see what other people think.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: