Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example
Дата
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNt7hoCvhRCZYYkYKYa1-PZ5_9VmuzoShhEiJHgEZwZqg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi Julien,

> I'm pretty sure that this is intentional.  The worker can be launched
> dynamically and in that case it still needs a GUC for the naptime.

The dynamic worker also is going to need worker_spi_database, however
the corresponding GUC declaration is placed below the check.

Perhaps we should just say that the extension shouldn't be used
without shared_preload_libraies. We are not testing whether it works
in such a case anyway.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example
Следующее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Сообщение: Should "REGRESS_OPTS = --temp-config" be working for 3rd party extensions?