Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ7c6TNntQrB2NsD7zWeFosNeJkqMtjX1th6peKGP0A+YR2bsQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..) (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Matthias, > Apart from this comment on the format of the patch, the result seems solid. Many thanks. > When updating a patchset generally we try to keep the patches > self-contained, and update patches as opposed to adding incremental > patches to the set. My reasoning was to separate my changes from the ones originally proposed by Teodor. After doing `git am` locally a reviewer can see them separately, or together with `git diff origin/master`, whatever he or she prefers. The committer can choose between committing two patches ony by one, or rebasing them to a single commit. I will avoid the "patch for the patch" practice from now on. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: