Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Khandekar
Тема Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Дата
Msg-id CAJ3gD9f9tBa1GPnsW909gbqmyiTW7hj46GJ3=exVseqG_mYthQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 30 November 2017 at 18:56, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> While addressing Thomas's point about test scenarios not yet covered,
> I observed the following ...
>
> Suppose an UPDATE RLS policy with a WITH CHECK clause is defined on
> the target table. Now In ExecUpdate(), the corresponding WCO qual gets
> executed *before* the partition constraint check, as per existing
> behaviour. And the qual succeeds. And then because of partition-key
> updated, the row is moved to another partition. Here, suppose there is
> a BR INSERT trigger which modifies the row, and the resultant row
> actually would *not* pass the UPDATE RLS policy. But for this
> partition, since it is an INSERT, only INSERT RLS WCO quals are
> executed.
>
> So effectively, with a user-perspective, an RLS WITH CHECK policy that
> was defined to reject an updated row, is getting updated successfully.
> This is because the policy is not checked *after* a row trigger in the
> new partition is executed.
>
> Attached is a test case that reproduces this issue.
>
> I think, in case of row-movement, we should defer calling
> ExecWithCheckOptions() until the row is being inserted using
> ExecInsert(). And then in ExecInsert(), ExecWithCheckOptions() should
> be called using WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK rather than WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK
> (I recall Amit Langote was of this opinion) as below :
>
> --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
> +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,9 @@ ExecInsert(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
>   * we are looking for at this point.
>   */
>   if (resultRelInfo->ri_WithCheckOptions != NIL)
> -     ExecWithCheckOptions(WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK,
> +        ExecWithCheckOptions((mtstate->operation == CMD_UPDATE ?
> +                             WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK : WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK),
>                               resultRelInfo, slot, estate);

Attached is v28 patch which has the fix for this issue as described
above. In ExecUpdate(), if partition constraint fails, we skip
ExecWithCheckOptions (), and later in ExecInsert() it gets called with
WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK.

Added a few test scenarios for the same, in regress/sql/update.sql.

-- 
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Beena Emerson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping