Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
От | Amit Khandekar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ3gD9eeOzHUZXqwXM8T=vhAnXk_GrgYbDjTYg0vMFNbmFcSKw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 14:02, Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Hi Amit, > > I am reading about this feature and reviewing it. > To start with, I reviewed the patch: 0005-Doc-changes-describing-details-about-logical-decodin.patch. Thanks for picking up the patch review. Your reply somehow spawned a new mail thread, so I reverted back to this thread for replying. > > >prevent VACUUM from removing required rows from the system catalogs, > >hot_standby_feedback should be set on the standby. In spite of that, > >if any required rows get removed on standby, the slot gets dropped. > IIUC, you mean `if any required rows get removed on *the master* the slot gets > dropped`, right? Yes, you are right. In fact, I think it is not necessary to explicitly mention where the rows get removed. So I have just omitted "on standby". Will include this change in the next patch versions. -- Thanks, -Amit Khandekar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: