Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
От | Amit Khandekar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ3gD9daWyQmEzNz57KNrEnDhUbRQ8xC70dG0=41PRHb=Yo7Qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 September 2017 at 07:43, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 31 August 2017 at 14:15, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks Dilip. I am working on rebasing the patch. Particularly, the >>> partition walker in my patch depended on the fact that all the tables >>> get opened (and then closed) while creating the tuple routing info. >>> But in HEAD, now only the partitioned tables get opened. So need some >>> changes in my patch. >>> >>> The partition walker related changes are going to be inapplicable once >>> the other thread [1] commits the changes for expansion of inheritence >>> in bound-order, but till then I would have to rebase the partition >>> walker changes over HEAD. >>> >>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0118a1f2-84bb-19a7-b906-dec040a206f2%40lab.ntt.co.jp >>> >> >> After recent commit 30833ba154, now the partitions are expanded in >> depth-first order. It didn't seem worthwhile rebasing my partition >> walker changes onto the latest code. So in the attached patch, I have >> removed all the partition walker changes. >> > > It seems you have forgotten to attach the patch. Oops sorry. Now attached. -- Thanks, -Amit Khandekar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: