Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance
От | Amit Khandekar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ3gD9dUDpmUD5DKkmCEXuADDwQ0OOntkC+4LHmz7RL0MMtpog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I did some performance testing on 0001+0002 here, and found that > for me, there's basically no change on x86_64 but a win of 2 to 3 > percent on aarch64, using Pavel's pi_est_1() as a representative > case for simple plpgsql statements. That squares with your original > results I believe. It's not clear to me whether any of the later > tests in this thread measured these changes in isolation, or only > with 0003 added. Yeah I had the same observation. 0001+0002 seems to benefit mostly on aarch64. And 0003 (exec_case_value) benefited both on amd64 and aarch64. > > Anyway, that's good enough for me, so I pushed 0001+0002 after a > little bit of additional cosmetic tweaking. > > I attach your original 0003 here (it still applies, with some line > offsets). That's just so the cfbot doesn't get confused about what > it's supposed to test now. Thanks for pushing all the three ! Thanks, -Amit Khandekar Huawei Technologies
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: