Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0zyc+X-5dCRjdoF41r46-F-Rbr=cHLcG4VjYdSe7pY55w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all. I have no objection > to Merlin's proposal though. I agree that PERFORM is starting to > look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance. All right -- I'll submit a revised patch with documentation adjustments. "Basic Statements" needs to be revised, in particular the section, "Executing a Command With No Result". I'm inclined to remove that section completely, and rename the next section from "Executing a Query with a Single-row Result" to simply, "Executing a Query" (or perhaps "Non-Dynamic Query"). I'd like to remove documentation and usage of PERFORM except for a note mentioning the old syntax...this would replace the current note that existentially questions the necessity of PERFORM in the first place. Thanks. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: