Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0zozNhzrPJXL9F1k63XtgUaUvZZs7051CxJkvJznEjXqw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 05/20/2015 09:16 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: > >> >Attached is a patch against master to generalize the JSON-producing >> >functions in utils/adt/json.c and to provide a set of callbacks which can >> >be overridden the same way that is already provided for *parsing* JSON. > >> I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it sure seems like a lot of >> changes, and moderately invasive ones, to support something that could be >> done, at the cost of reparsing, with a simple loadable extension that I >> could create in a few hours of programming. > > But this seems like a pretty reasonable change to make, no? Doesn't the > total amount of code decrease after this patch? JSON stuff is pretty > new so some refactoring and generalization of what we have is to be > expected. Yeah. Also, there have been a few previous gripes about this, for example, http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHbVmPzS+sVR+y-UgxjRq+XW4dqteVL-cOzc69zFFwmxjcKCxg@mail.gmail.com. As noted, I definitely prefer 'space free' by default for efficiency reasons, but standardizing the output has definitely got to be a reasonable goal. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: