Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0zkFWqmg11d+wgT=c=VPjzQC747bJUtxwX4-OKam=xvJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10? (Bráulio Bhavamitra <brauliobo@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra <brauliobo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm finally having performance issues with PostgreSQL when doing big > analytics queries over almost the entire database of more than 100gb of > data. > > And what I keep reading all over the web is many databases switching to > columnar store (RedShift, Cassandra, cstore_fdw, etc) and having great > performance on queries in general and giant boosts with big analytics > queries. > > I wonder if there is any plans to move postgresql entirely to a columnar > store (or at least make it an option), maybe for version 10? > > The current extensions are rather limited (types support for example) and > require quite some configuration and data migration to work, besides they > don't work in services like AWS RDS. Column stores are better at one case (selecting a few columns from a very wide table) and worse at just about every other case. Also, beware database benchmarks -- as they say, there is no free lunch There is a reason why databases store things in rows. Analytics in traditional postgres tables is definitely possible, but you have to be smart. merlin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: