Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0zf-nFfpkHHw7Lme-OPJJ5j4sNs2kSCK9=YUURUB8zU5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional (Filip Rembiałkowski <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is my next try, after suggestions from -perf and -hackers list: > > * no GUC > > * small addition to NOTIFY grammar: NOTIFY ALL/DISTINCT > > * corresponding, 3-argument version of pg_notify(text,text,bool) This is all sounding pretty good. I wonder if the third argument should be a boolean however. If we make it 'text, 'send mode', instead, we could leave some room for more specialization of the queuing behavior. For example, we've had a couple of requests over the years to have an 'immediate' mode which dumps the notification immediately to the client without waiting for tx commit. This may or may not be a good idea, but if it was ultimately proved to be, it could be introduced as an alternate mode without adding an extra function. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: