Re: json function volatility
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: json function volatility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0yat7oc-sYmjAS5jpmyNVot+7w11sed_CNjZv_b6_vH0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | json function volatility (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: json function volatility
Re: json function volatility |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Following up something Pavel wrote, I notice that json_agg() and > json_object_agg() are both marked as immutable, even though they invoke IO > functions, while json_object is marked stable, even though it does not, and > can probably be marked as immutable. Mea maxima culpa. > > I'm not sure what we should do about these things now. Is it a tragedy if we > let these escape into the 9.4 release that way? Is it too late to change them? Either way, it seems fairly implausible someone would come up with a case to stick json_agg(), or any aggregate function really, inside of an index. So it's not exactly the crime of the century. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: