Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0xv-vzKt8A2zvtHQe_a88qZ+ccFUVHsV7+NcbXrKccRAQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> yeah -- the thing is, we are already too spendy already on >> supplemental write i/o (hint bits, visible bits, freezing, etc) and >> likely not worth it to throw something else on the pile unless the >> page is already dirty; the medium term trend in storage is that read >> vs write performance is becoming increasingly asymmetric, particularly >> on the random side so it's very unlikely to balance out. > > Guess I wasn't clear but I was thinking to read the page in, not do any > writing, and do it in a asynchronous way to the process doing the evicting. no -- I got you. My point was, that's a pure guess unless you base it on evidence recorded on the page itself. Without that evidence, (which requires writing) the operating is in a a better place to make that guess so it's probably better to defer that decision. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: