Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0xSJR=r4savNfMcpzxBh9ZzgMc4aZtD4DxramZiexkYSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 ("Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> wrote: > > 9.3.5: > 0.035940 END; > > > 9.4beta2: > 0.957854 END; time being spent on 'END' is definitely suggesting i/o related issues. This is making me very skeptical that postgres is the source of the problem. I also thing synchronous_commit is not set properly on the new instance (or possibly there is a bug or some such). Can you verify via: select * from pg_settings where name = 'synchronous_commit'; on both servers? What is iowait? For pci-e SSD, these drives don't seem very fast... merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: