Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0x-961dSA9eYtf4DVs0aUVbH53PYoxCd_wFvY+3LX54XA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MT2gzzbyWpw > > At around 8 minutes, he shows utilization statistics for cube at > around 1% across their install base. That's higher than I would have > guessed, so, eh, shows what I know. In any case, I'm not so much > advocating not caring at all as confining the level of caring to what > can be done without moving the earth. cube is a dependency for earthdistance and it's gotten some light advocacy throughout the years as the 'way to do it'. I tried it myself way back in the day and concluded a while back that the 'box' type + gist was better than earthdistance for bounding box operations -- it just seemed easier to understand and use. If you search the archives you'll probably find a couple of examples of me suggesting as such. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: