Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0wYA6A0+K=iH2-oX+6Q20TFqhk6o7dOrurEEOY=5iftLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Hello, This is a new version of the patch formerly known as > 'alternative storage for libpq'. I took a quick look at the patch and the docs. Looks good and agree with rationale and implementation. I see you covered the pqsetvalue case which is nice. I expect libpq C api clients coded for performance will immediately gravitate to this api. > - The meaning of PGresAttValue is changed. The field 'value' now > contains a value withOUT terminating zero. This change seems to > have no effect on any other portion within the whole source > tree of postgresql from what I've seen. This is a minor point of concern. This function was exposed to support libpqtypes (which your stuff compliments very nicely by the way) and I quickly confirmed removal of the null terminator didn't cause any problems there. I doubt anyone else is inspecting the structure directly (also searched the archives and didn't find anything). This needs to be advertised very loudly in the docs -- I understand why this was done but it's a pretty big change in the way the api works. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: