Re: Slow response to my query
От | Keith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slow response to my query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHw75vuDpf+XVPKotPTy7vDAqy2=NNDWdTsGR35JUORdKjOUQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slow response to my query (Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slow response to my query
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:56 AM Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:38:53 +0100
Goke Aruna <goksie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jean-Yves / Steven,
> am using V12.
Depending on the way you mostly use your columns, you can also do the
opposite: store date/timestamp into "pieces" in different columns
(century, month, day, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds, time zone
shift) and reconstitute a whole date/ts into an auto-generated column.
Sometimes, you have to break the rules, especially with a large number of
rows, because pre-calculation is way better than post in this case.
Depending on your needs, you might also be interested into that:
https://severalnines.com/database-blog/guide-partitioning-data-postgresql
BTW, don't leave us dry, share your progress and results *<;-)
Jean-Yves
Please do not advise the use of inheritance/trigger based partitioning anymore, especially on PG12. Partitioning is now part of core and is much more easily managed that way
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: